Anons79 Mini Shell

Return-Path: <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Delivered-To: proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
Received: from nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with LMTP
	id I2W/GDpLeWZouTMAm3PG5w
	(envelope-from <hello@frankman.co.uk>)
	for <proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:32:26 +0000
Return-path: <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Envelope-to: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:32:26 +0000
Received: from satq.frankman.info ([96.47.236.154]:37322)
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <hello@frankman.co.uk>)
	id 1sLgzm-0000000EDf1-1gQz
	for info@proudlyafrican.co.uk;
	Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:32:26 +0000
Received: from [96.47.236.157] (unknown [96.47.236.157])
	by satq.frankman.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F213014369
	for <info@proudlyafrican.co.uk>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 06:04:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
To: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
From: "Evie Scott" <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 03:04:15 -0700
Reply-To: surreydigitalprint@gmail.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.6
X-Spam-Score: 76
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Hi, I looked over your website; it’s not ranking on Google
    and other major search engines. We are an SEO company. My costs are affordable
    for nearly everyone. 
 Content analysis details:   (7.6 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.8 KAM_COUK               Scoring .co.uk emails higher due to poor registry
                             security.
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?96.47.236.154>]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  1.5 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  1.5 KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE   DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the
                             message and the domain has a DMARC
                             quarantine policy
  2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Page 1 Google

Hi,

I looked over your website; it=E2=80=99s not ranking on Google and other ma=
jor search engines.

We are an SEO company. My costs are affordable for nearly everyone.

Please let us know if you are interested, and I'll send you a proposal with=
 our prices, SEO strategy, and results from what we have achieved for other=
 clients.

Yours sincerely
Evie Scott
________________________________________________________
NOTE:  Reply to this email for more information.