Anons79 Mini Shell

Return-Path: <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Delivered-To: proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
Received: from nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with LMTP
	id JBbnFt+ydWbT6TYAm3PG5w
	(envelope-from <hello@frankman.co.uk>)
	for <proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech>; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:05:35 +0000
Return-path: <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Envelope-to: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:05:35 +0000
Received: from satq.frankman.info ([96.47.236.154]:57104)
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <hello@frankman.co.uk>)
	id 1sKhhd-0000000F5vr-0Mtl
	for info@proudlyafrican.co.uk;
	Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:05:35 +0000
Received: from [96.47.236.157] (unknown [96.47.236.157])
	by satq.frankman.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8970119218
	for <info@proudlyafrican.co.uk>; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:35:01 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
To: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
From: "Evie Scott" <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:35:01 -0700
Reply-To: surreydigitalprint@gmail.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.6
X-Spam-Score: 76
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Good Day, Would you be interested in building a new site or
    possibly rebuilding/repairing your existing site? We are a professional development
    company. I would like to send you my website proposal and examples of websites
    to see the kind of quality you can expect to receive. 
 Content analysis details:   (7.6 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.8 KAM_COUK               Scoring .co.uk emails higher due to poor registry
                             security.
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?96.47.236.157>]
  1.5 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
  1.5 KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE   DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the
                             message and the domain has a DMARC
                             quarantine policy
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Your website

Good Day,

Would you be interested in building a new site or possibly rebuilding/repai=
ring your existing site? We are a professional development company.

I would like to send you my website proposal and examples of websites to se=
e the kind of quality you can expect to receive.

Do let me know if you are interested.

Kind Regards,
Evie Scott
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D