Anons79 Mini Shell

Directory : /home/proudlyafrican/mail/.spam/new/
Upload File :
Current File : //home/proudlyafrican/mail/.spam/new/1718874211.M86028P1539613.nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech,S=3266,W=3339

Return-Path: <hello@volumenine.co.uk>
Delivered-To: proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
Received: from nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with LMTP
	id R0S/BGPwc2YdfhcAm3PG5w
	(envelope-from <hello@volumenine.co.uk>)
	for <proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech>; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:03:31 +0000
Return-path: <hello@volumenine.co.uk>
Envelope-to: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:03:31 +0000
Received: from rache.volumenine.info ([96.47.237.11]:54128)
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <hello@volumenine.co.uk>)
	id 1sKDhX-00000006SLX-46pm
	for info@proudlyafrican.co.uk;
	Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:03:31 +0000
Received: from [96.47.236.157] (unknown [96.47.236.157])
	by rache.volumenine.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0D4231C030
	for <info@proudlyafrican.co.uk>; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 04:27:58 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
To: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
From: "Mike Moore" <hello@volumenine.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 01:27:57 -0700
Reply-To: surreydigitalprint@gmail.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.3
X-Spam-Score: 63
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Hi, I can bring you people who are looking for your services.
    We are an UK based reasonably priced SEO company. I have some ideas that
   I'd like to discuss with you, and wondered if you'd be free for a discussion
    this week? 
 Content analysis details:   (6.3 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.8 KAM_ADVERT2            BODY: This is probably an unwanted commercial
                             email...
  0.8 KAM_COUK               Scoring .co.uk emails higher due to poor registry
                             security.
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?96.47.236.157>]
  1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
                             anti-forgery methods
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Page 1 Google

Hi,

I can bring you people who are looking for your services. We are an UK base=
d reasonably priced SEO company.

I have some ideas that I'd like to discuss with you, and wondered if you'd =
be free for a discussion this week?

Please reply to this email for more information in details.

Kind Regards
Mike Moore
___________________________________________________
Please reply with a 'NO' if you are not interested.

Anons79 File Manager Version 1.0, Coded By Anons79
Email: [email protected]