Anons79 Mini Shell

Directory : /home/proudlyafrican/mail/.spam/new/
Upload File :
Current File : //home/proudlyafrican/mail/.spam/new/1718621253.M345709P1420122.nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech,S=3403,W=3477

Return-Path: <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Delivered-To: proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
Received: from nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with LMTP
	id 8SI0FEUUcGZaqxUAm3PG5w
	(envelope-from <hello@frankman.co.uk>)
	for <proudlyafrican+spam@nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech>; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:47:33 +0000
Return-path: <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Envelope-to: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:47:33 +0000
Received: from satq.frankman.info ([96.47.236.154]:51648)
	by nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <hello@frankman.co.uk>)
	id 1sJ9tY-00000005xKE-1Hu1
	for info@proudlyafrican.co.uk;
	Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:47:33 +0000
Received: from [96.47.236.157] (unknown [96.47.236.157])
	by satq.frankman.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 53AE01833C
	for <info@proudlyafrican.co.uk>; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:22:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
To: info@proudlyafrican.co.uk
From: "Lisa Fox" <hello@frankman.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:22:45 -0700
Reply-To: hello.prowebagency@gmail.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.6
X-Spam-Score: 76
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "nc-ph-2432.beatq.tech",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Hi, I am hoping to discuss how, if at all, you would like
   to improve your website. I'm sure you receive many emails offering something
    similar, which means I need to try and stand out. I pride myself on the service
    we provide. I have many testimonials to back this up. 
 Content analysis details:   (7.6 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.8 KAM_COUK               Scoring .co.uk emails higher due to poor registry
                             security.
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?96.47.236.157>]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  1.5 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
  1.5 KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE   DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the
                             message and the domain has a DMARC
                             quarantine policy
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Website Management

Hi,

I am hoping to discuss how, if at all, you would like to improve your websi=
te. I'm sure you receive many emails offering something similar, which mean=
s I need to try and stand out.

I pride myself on the service we provide. I have many testimonials to back =
this up.

Do you have a moment today or this week for a conversation?

Kind Regards
Lisa Fox
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Anons79 File Manager Version 1.0, Coded By Anons79
Email: [email protected]